'Psychology and Christianity Integration Paper Essay\r'

'psychological learning and Christianity: deuce subjects that set out expect to be go in almost impossible to bubble about hand in hand. psychology has become one tot tout ensembley several(predicate) subject than Christianity (theology) and some(prenominal) flummox mixed-up all(prenominal)(prenominal) contact with the different. Psychology is stringently a science and Christianity is solely establish on faith and religion and the two sack up not be coordinated together. The real question is why? why can’t psychological science and Christianity be integrated and used together as one? This writeship go forth pay up whatever dictionary interpretations of both subjects, depart provide definitions based on the authors opinion, and depart discuss the authors viewpoint on the integrating of the two.\r\nThe American Heritage dictionary defines psychological science as â€Å"the science that deals with mental processes and doings” (American Heritage Di ctionary, 2000) and defines Christianity as â€Å"the Christian religion, founded on the life and teachings of Jesus” (American Heritage Dictionary, 2000). As you could suck up, both definitions used the treatments science and religion placing both subjects in their decl ar categories. In modern days, religion and science can not be comp ard except rather contrasted. The integrating of the two does not make sense for those who call up thither should be empirical evidence for everything or state who ar dependent on the Christian religion and this is where society runs into a problem. The author of this paper, however, deliberates in that respect should be no problem integrating the two. In her eyes, psychological science is the study of the mind and behavior, not necessarily a science moreover to a greater extent a study.\r\nShe does not use the word science because she understands that at that place argon things in the field of psychology that have no empirical answer and therefore can not necessarily be a science, because either things science can be tested and upraised. Being a Christian, she believes Christianity is a name for the faith in her superior Jesus Christ. Because she is a Christian, her window to the cosmos has been shaped through the Word, her experience and what she k directlys to be true. In her eyes, perfection is the creator of the priming coat and the empyrean and any things work because of Him. She believes that all things can be integrated with Christianity (theology) because perfection brought everything to this homo. She has confidence in the fact that psychology and Christianity can be integrated. She ascertains the faults that can come of it solely she excessively does not see a reason for complete separation.\r\n accord to the American Heritage Dictionary (2000) defines integration as making something a whole, unite(a) different things as one. The author of this paper understands the integration of psychology and Christianity comparable this…psychology is the head (mind) and Christianity is the heart (soul) nevertheless neither one can work without the other. Because of the attainment of the world, with technology, science and the indispensability to prove all things empirically, faith has, in a focus, been pushed out-of-door and not as weighty, but this is wrong. beau ideal is the one that has placed deal on this Earth to provide progression and advances and without Him all things would not be possible. So, in revision to fully understand these different non-theological subjects it is principal(prenominal) to understand that faith and religion are the reason for all other subjects and that integration is actually completely necessary. save there are limitations to this.\r\nThe advances of science and technology have molded the human mind into thought process that there is a need for induction because are very few things that cannot be proven and why would believe in something that cannot be proven when there are so many things that have been empirically proven? This is where the idea of integration gets messy because there is no experiential focusing to prove the surviveence of divinity fudge and his all-mighty power. But this argument can be debated evening further. Let’s take a peek at the idea of the unconscious mind mind. Clearly this is a psychology thing but why can’t it be related to faith because hence the unconscious mind has not been completely proven. at that place is proof that there is such thing as the unconscious but no tangible proof of what goes on and what controls the unconscious. For example, there is no way to prove or disprove the topic of ones dream.\r\nA scientist can set someone up to an EEG and stones throw their brainwaves while they are dreaming but there is no way to prove or pulse the capability of their dream. This is much similar faith. unrivaled can be tested on the exist ence of their faith and religion but there is no true way of proving it; but there is also no true way of disproving it. So what now? Well in the eyes of the author there is no answer. Either you believe in the possibility of integration or you do not, and a majority of people who do have had an experience that has allowed them to see the true importance of said integration.\r\nThe other problem that arises with integration is that some Christians are overly explicit with their beliefs. This is bad because people, in these days, are afraid of explicit people so these grapheme of Christians are leave off out by people in the scientific realm, because yes God created science but for those that do not understand that deviation after it in that way turns them off. Psychology has its domains and Christianity has its domains but there is some cooccur…it is when to approach that overlap that gets messy. There is also the secular stand of â€Å"Christians being hypocrites.” There is a chance that psychology and Christianity have become so separated because some Christians do not want to be judged by other Christians. Back in the day, Christians would go to their pastors for help but now, because of solicitude of judgement, Christians want an outside view, a psychologist. Now, in this context, it is hard for integration. But this is not what integration needs to mean.\r\nIntegration is simply unifying two things as one. Understanding that God created the Earth and the Heavens and that all things are made and work in God’s power allows for integration to happen. So what do we need to do? Do we need to come up with both a psychological and theological definition for integration? No. We simply need to come to the conclusion that Christians exit believe in Christian shipway and scientists leave alone believe in scientific ways and how both understand integration will be dependent on each individuals life, experience and truth. Because on both e nds of the spectrum, there are unanswered questions and there will always be unanswered questions. Questions like who is God? what is sin? how do we measure God’s truth? who says record book is true? what does faith look like? what is the unconscious? how do we measure the content of dreams? how do we measure the idea of â€Å" eyesight the light?”\r\nThese are all important questions but questions that without extreme progression and world advances will not be answered. That type of progression will not exist in the lifetime of this author so what she has concluded is that God created the world and the Heavens and that he creates all things in it. Therefore, in regularize for science to work, in order for psychology to work, there must be an acceptance of it being God’s world. Because if there is no God, there were did all this stuff come from?\r\n'