Inter-Recial Prejudice Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words

Inter-Recial Prejudice - Essay modellingImportant reflections of this definition are the words damage/ injury, judgment/ action and disregard. two damage and disregard may be considered as a result of the judgment passed by the someone practicing prejudice upon the person who is at the receiving end. Research in prejudice (Baron and Bryne, 208-209) shows that such judgments are passed on the can of bosss held and on the basis of the discrimination resulting from the stereotypes. Stereotypes are cognitive shortcuts that commonwealth use in order to categorise individuals on the basis of a few characteristics without paying attention to any another(prenominal) characteristics that may bed the particular individual from the group. The stereotypes in themselves are not cast out but may be associated with other negative thoughts about the categories, which are then applied to the particular individual without even ascertaining if the individual deserves to be categorized in t his manner. Moghaddam (in Schneider, Gruman and Coutts, 345) defines prejudice as an attitude based solely on group social rank. This definition underlines the fact that an individuals membership to a particular group is an heavy aspect of the way raft view them and could bias the attitudes of others if they hold stereotypes about the said group. Most types of group memberships are invisible to the outsider for example, training, education, occupation, and religion. Unless the individual divulges these facts, others are unable to classify him / her on the basis of these affiliations that the individual has. except membership to groups like gender and race are not invisible and come across as part of the individuals physical characteristics. Thus, it accommodates easy for others to classify an individual on the basis of these factors. When people from different racial background interact, often the first information they share with each other in the beginning they even initiate contact is the information supplied by their physical appearance. If an individual holds a negative stereotype against a particular race he / she is likely to notion prejudiced against individuals from that racial background. This prejudice would be experienced even before there is any communication and it is likely that due to the pre-existing prejudice, this individual short-changes the other simply due to their racial background (Sears, Peplau, Freedman and Taylor, 417). Baron and Bryne (207) describe another important aspect of why people experience prejudice social categorization. They describe how people tend to categorize others on the basis of the extent to which they feel similar to those individuals. Persons who are perceived as similar become part of the in-group, and those who seem different become part of the out group. People also typically feel more favorable towards members of an in-group then towards members of an out-group. This is because people like to feel go od about themselves and their group memberships and thereof tend to highlight not just the positive aspects of their individual selves, but those of others they feel similar to. For the aforementioned(prenominal) reason, they play down the negative aspects of their own and similar others behaviors. On the other hand, people tend to inflate the weaknesses of dissimilar others, and play down the positive aspects of their behavior. This leads to the Fundamental attribution error a fallacy where people attribute positive causes to personal behavior (and as a consequence the behavior of similar others) and negative causes to behaviors of dissimilar others. Although the reason why humans prefer to categorize people into in-groups and out-groups is not properly unsounded it is a tendency that is found in all people