Narrative Argument About Education Essay Example for Free

Narrative Argument About Education EssayReading the web is not the very(prenominal) as training in the control or magazine or even newspaper. The information that you represent from the inter acquit may not stick with you as long as it would if you were to read a book, newspaper, magazine, or journal. This cant be a hundred percent accurate for everyone, just now according to well-nigh people that I have questioned, the information that they read from the web/internet doesnt stick with them as long as it does when they read an actual book, newspaper, or magazine. Personal computers can be empowering tools in a way of cultivation about technology, but in my opinion they do no good for learning when it comes to critical sentiment skills and gaining accurate information for yourself. Most of the web pages that ar out there are not even filled with accurate information. If there is no context on the web for the explore you are looking up, then neither is there any history for it. Nothing online has been indexed before 1980, so therefore the information is not completely accurate and gainful copeledge.According to Judith Levine, most of the data her students net are exchangeable trash fish, and by that I tang like she means that the information that they pee is worthless and will not serve well them in any way. I would have to say that I can nurse with her statement beca use up as a web surfer myself I dont see how it helps me. Yes, it does give me certain education in the information that I am surfing about, but it does and will not help me as much as it would if I were to read a book about that very same subject. I can gain more existledge and keep it memorized with a book much easier than I can surfing the web.Judith talks about her students not being fitting to concentrate when she asks them to organize their impressions into coherent stories, and I find that to be due to the lack of critical idea skills from not see books anymore and us ing this computer technology for all of their research and surfing articles. I feel like students dont get the full education of the subject that they need when they crosscut it by using the web for their papers. I agree with Judiths statement about the diagnosis of an pestiferous attention deficit disorder. It can be caused by the casual clicking and pointing that has come to stand in for happy inquiry.Technology may empower, but when will the power of it be used? Students dont read anymore and so their critical thinking skills are not as great as they could be if they would just read instead. They should be rendition books like literature, history, poetry, and politics so they can be hearing to people who know what they are talking about. Otherwise, the information they get will be of no use to them. The search engines that retrieve more than 100,000 links or none at all, they will be unenviable at discerning meaning, or discerning at all (Paragraph 14).After reading the sto ry of Judith Levines argument about using the web for research papers versus reading books, I can feel like I totally agree with her on every aspect. Because reading makes you use your brain. turn reading you would be forced to reason out many things which are unfamiliar to you. Reading improves your vocabulary immortalize in elementary school when you learned how to infer the meaning of one word by reading the context of the other words in the sentence? You get the same benefit from book reading. While reading books, especially challenging ones, you will find yourself exposed to many new words you wouldnt be otherwise.Reading also improves concentration and focus. It requires you to focus on what you are reading for long periods. dissimilar magazines, internet posts or e-mails that might contain small chunks of information, books tell the whole story. Since you must concentrate in order to read, like a muscle, you will get better at concentration Just like Judith talked about in her argument, she feels like the etiology of attention deficit disorder is due to the fact that students these geezerhood are not reading books anymore, but are only surfing the web which doesnt help the brain to focus and concentrate.When students surf the web for answers there is no way of them being able to know if any particular fact is accurate or not. But when they read books it gives them better information that is real to be accurate. So, when Judith Levine argues the point that she feels reading books, magazines, newspapers and etc. are better that surfing the web, I would have to agree with her because it help us in our comprehension, practices our fluency, and many others. But nowadays, because reading books is boring and you have to read for nearly a week or month, students today are so lazy to that and they always have the row of, its a waste of timeUsing Computer is widely practice todays generation. It is almost needed in the society. You can also be called an il literate when you dont know how to use it, because even a 7 years old kid can use the computer. Computers are easy to use, reliable, fast, and consume a short period of time I believe that is why in the beginning of Judiths argument she quoted tiptop Gates statement after he bestowed a $cc million gift to Americas public libraries so they could hook up to the internet and I understand why he would feel the way he does about computers because of how popular they are in todays society, but in my opinion I feel that they are not as empowering as people seem to think that they are. They will not give you the education and critical thinking skills that you need like books will do for you. So, therefore I would have to agree with her argument towards Bill Gates decision and statement.