To What Extent Were Gorbachevs Reforms A Failure Politics Essay

To What Extent Were Gorbachevs Reforms A Failure Politics EssayThe second half of the 1980s was mark as the fundamental change in the Soviet era. The era of reconstruction, Pe eternal sleeproika had gone into history, with the main(prenominal) purpose of introducing the freshly Soviet Union, which was the creation of the legal social read and democratisation of a new country. It is considered the most dramatic event in political economy to happen since the Great Depression of the 1930s1The research mind To what extent could the political and socio- scotch consequences of Gorbachevs reforms be considered a also-ran? adopts a critical and evaluative approach of the Soviet reforms such as, perestroika, new political thinking and glasnost, during the middle 1980s, assessing negative as considerably as corroboratory consequences of the reform. This investigation explores the question of whether the socio- sparing and political changes caused by Gorbachevs reforms can be either justified as a complete failure, contributing to decline in socio-economic development and political factors, or on the other side viewed as a successful insurance policy, that brought freedom to eastbound Europe. For answering the question it is essential to examine the political and socio-economic conditions and address the necessity of such changes that was caused by a profound crisis in the of the Soviet-Union pre-Gorbachev era prevailing in late 1970s.Regardless of the conclusion, this topic go away remain under contr all oversy causing different judgments among the historians, as an Emeritus Professor of politics at Oxford University verbalize The extent to which he Gorbachev is regarded a success or a failure will long remain a matter of controversy. there seems no doubt, though, that twain in Russia and outside he will be regarded as a figure of decisive importance, regardless of whether his activities are viewed positively or highly negatively.2During the investigatio n a wide range of sources was used, representing polar opposite perspectives of the West and the East, from twain the time of Perestroika and in hindsight. The sources used can be separated into three groups. The prototypic group were those who believed that the initiative and perseverance of Mikhail Gorbachevs reforms made the first step to turn back the transformation of the country to a civilised state of the Western world. The second group- evaluates Gorbachevs reforms more than negatively, believing that his imperialistic policy has led to serious irreversible consequences of the country. Fin exclusivelyy, the third group includes political scientists and economists like Marshall I. Goldman and who combine their studies in two approaches, considering both positive and negative aspects of Perestroika. Therefore, the essay will be divided into Political and Socio-Economic reforms of Perestroika during 1985 and 1991 according to these identified groups.2. Conditions in the So viet Union prior to PerestroikaThe necessity of Perestroika and such radical changes were caused by the profound crisis of the Soviet system that were formed in the late 70s including the fall of Soviet authority in the eyes of public look in the Soviet Russian and in the Eastern Europe, a so-called socialist camp, where new popular ideas were forming and demanding more human and political rights, as well as a rejection of the totalitarian regime.Therefore, for Mikhail Gorbachev, his reforms were seen as the best solution to the urgent political and socio-economic problems, which were aimed to strengthen and develop the Soviet Union. Furthermore, he was not anticipating that Perestroika would lead to a complete collapse of the system and USSR.a) PoliticalBetween 1980 and 1984, the changes in lead live with had a great contact on destabilising the government. Moreover, USA USSR relations were getting worsened every day. After the Yalta Conference and Churchills Iron Curtain sp eech all contributed to the growing fear of the Soviet Union3and the beginning of the raw War. The tilt of two sides, has increased the military budget of the country, while not helping its economy. Additionally, in the mid 1980s, the Soviet Union was demonstrating its military might in the Afghanistani war that has besides turned against it.4b) Socio-EconomicPrior to perestroika, the Soviet economy was marked by the extensive economic growth in the late 1960s that began to reap to the economical development backwards. In the consequent 20 social classs USSR has experienced a rapid decline in growth of industry from 8.5% to 3.5%. There was besides a problematic situation in consumers market which was also linked to the drop of oil prices. According to the economists, the prices of raw materials were comparatively cheap to other products, which caused uneffective and wasteful usage of these raw materials.5Between 1970 and 1980 USSR has make 170 billion US dollars from the petroleum export. However, again, this money was invested into the military expansion and purchase of new machinery which was inefficiently used and did not enrich the country in the long run.6The agricultural situation in the Soviet Union was also rather complex. The money earned from petroleum exports was used for food imports, instead of introducing new efficient agricultural reforms substituting the old collective system. The economic problems reflected on payoff in both agrarian and industrial sectors of the country. The harvest fell from 237 million tons from 1978 to 158 million tons in 1981, depicting a very radical change. as well as, the production of poise fell from 151 million in the 1978 to 147 million in 1982, which is particularly surprising as it always has been constant apart from the World War II uttermost.7The economic and political constraints in the country such as economic stagnation and corruption, contributed to the rapid decline in the social sphere. Budg ets proportion that went to people was not barely enough. This has lead to various social problems such as low standards of living, health care and high levels of alcoholism. These three main factors have bear upon the ideological and honourable value of the people in the country causing demoralisation of the society. That also affected the quality and efficiency of work, such as poor working habits and incentives.As a result, in the early 80s the income per capita has decreased three fold compared to mid 60s. Additionally, there were issues with income distribution, resulting in high inequality between the lower and higher classes. This, of course, all went against the communist ideology. People were deprived of the civil rights and as a result various dissident movements broke in USSR and Eastern Europe.3. Analysis of Political Reformsa) GlasnostGlasnost was the main political reform introduced in 1986 by Gorbachev. After 50 years of silence and fear the society was finally all owed to speak and express its opinions.With the policy of Glasnost, which Gorbachev has referred to as the other side of the Perestroikas coin, the system became less strict in many aspects of the society. This has included media, reduction in censorship and freedom of speech, opening up USSR to the rest of the world. Only in the year 1986 more than 14 million new newspapers were printed. After Olympic boycotts, the 1986 Goodwill games were seen live from both sides of the Iron Curtain. In the period of two years Gorbachev has made the fear disappear, bringing pop-culture to the USSR, creating a new breed of young people.8The policy of glasnost was responsible for drastically changing the spiritual aliveness for people. The government ceased prosecution of many tonality figures that were exiled under Stalins rule, like Andrei Sakharov, who was ininternal exile for seven years.9Gorbachev said that they need glasnost in order to ensure fulfillment of tasks of the Party congress10or in other words Perestroika was used as the base for his reforms. Primarily it was aimed to criticise and expose the corrupt leadership and was an instrument to improve political activity. In his speech to the January 1987 CC Plenum, Gorbachev has said there canbe no person beyond criticism or people with no right to criticise.11b) Intellectual EliteNatan Edelman, a well-known historian, wrote in 1989 that the intellectuals support for Perestroikais virtually unanimous.12All the great minds that were deprived during the Soviet Regime, has benefited from Gorbachevs reforms. Gorbachevs reforms have assured intellectuals of the right to free speech, unprecedented artistic freedom, wide access to the mass media, and a chance to be elected to the Soviet legislature and to dish up in government.13These were the kind of thinkers who were essential for countrys future growth.c) DemocratisationWith the reform of Perestroika a general democratisation of life began in the country. Gorbachev p ublicly verbalize that Democratisation will not weaken our society but on the contrary, it will strengthen it.14Even though many were against the political reforms, the supreme Council has adopted two new laws changing and altering the Constitution of the USSR, and introducing voting system for peoples deputies. The final stage of the political reform which was the Congress of public Deputies of the USSR, has elected Gorbachev as the president of the USSR. patronage the numerous mistakes in the reforms, this was still a attributeificant step towards liberation from the previous one-party system.d) US-Soviet RelationsThe slogan of the new political thinking, was a monolithic change for the USSR and the world. The main idea of the concept was that any military conflict, is wrong. During the 1987 Washington Summit meeting between leaders of the USSR Mikhail Gorbachev and the U.S. President Ronald Reagan, a disarmament treaty was finally agreed and theatreed.15Gorbachevs new thinki ng and non-aggressive policy improved the US-Soviet relations as well as the international situation in general. Weapons of mass oddment were reduced by 2000 warheads. USSR has refused to further confront the West and wished for an end of the Cold War, for which Gorbachev received a Nobel Prize. This breakthrough has not that brought relief to the American-Soviet tensions, but has also allowed Gorbachev to cut the military budget that was essential to reduce the inflationary pressure and improve the living standards.16e) Afghan War and The Brezhnev DoctrineDuring 27th Party Congress in February/March 1986 after confirming the Brezhnev Doctrine,17the failed operation in maintaining Afghanistan gave Gorbachev no other choice in than to abandon the Doctrine and follow the policy of Perestroika. By 1989 Gorbachev withdrew almost all combat personnel from Afghanistan.18After the free elections in Poland which were marked by Communist Partys defeat by Solidarity in 1989, Gorbachev has r enounced the Brezhnev Doctrine.19His speech at the UN on Dec. 7, 1989 represents the abandonment of communism from the Eastern Europe.In the next two years, theirnumerical strength will be reduced by 500,000 persons, and the volumeof stodgy arms will also be cut considerably. . By agreement with our allies in theWar aphorism Pact, we have made the decision to withdraw half-dozen tank divisionsfrom the GDR, Czechoslovakia, and Hungary, and to disband them by 1991.20f) Conclusion of political reformsThe results of Perestroika in terms of foreign policy and political freedom cannot be considered a failure. Due to the policy of glasnost, the media and formation of independent press could now criticise anyone they wanted. People were finally free to speak. Perestroika was a big step towards liberalism with multyparty system and elections.21Now, almost 20 years after Perestroika, Gorbachev himself, who has lost the political power to Yeltsin after Perestroika, does not regret his action s and marks the results of his reforms as success . Gorbachev claims it was such a success as it launched the democratic process in the Soviet Union. After the break-up ofUSSR, Russia today is continuing to develop the market economy as well as pluralism in several domains such as politics, ideologies, religion, etc22Collapse of the Soviet totalitarian empire and the formation of the 15 new states, some of which later became the members of NATO and a part of new Europe end of the socialist camp and the Warsaw Pact with democratic changes in the political system can all be seen as examples of positive sides of Gorbachevs reform. It also had a further positive effect on economic reforms, that in the long-run has resulted in growth in Eastern Europe and Russia. Moreover, according to Gorbachev, another positive side was that they have managed to avoid a real bloodbath23in achieving these changes.On contrary, the radical changes were not welcomed by most of the older generation Soviet party members. They believed that the perfect Soviet regime has started to lose its totalitarian control and its isolationist character. For example, the control over media that resulted in a weaker censorship, has then opened many negative aspects of USSR that has been previously presented to be flawless. Gen. Valentin Varennikov, Chief of Soviet Ground Forces has stated that the social and military situation of the country was becoming worse24and Nina Anderyeva, a historian, saw the younger generations negative attitude towards the Soviet past as a moral degradation and a negative result of Glasnost.25The society has started to hear the problems in the Soviet Union such as poor living conditions, alcoholism etc.The nationalistic feeling and the strive to independence from the East European countries has increased. umpteen ethical problems which were previously sealed, have now opened into various riots, demanding for greater independence and stabilisation of the economy.4. Analys is of Socio-economic Reformsa) Economic reformsThe crisis in the economic development was a significant reason for the Soviet leadership in changing the structure of the economy. In July 1987, theSupreme Soviethas passed the Law on State Enterprise. It was seen as the key in conversion to a market economy26. The core of reform included the abandonment of the old planned economy and transition of the decision-making from state to nonpublic businesses. This has resulted in abolition of the Ministry of Foreign Trade and the GKES, which were involved in foreign economic operations before.27However, the initial process of privatisation was much slower than planned. A fiddling number of vendors was the main reason for high prices on the market, and the prices of goods in cooperatives were always higher than the prices in state stores. By 1989, only after one year of Perestroikas inception there were 133,000 private ownerships. However, in comparison to Chinas ten million private enterpr ises in 1980,28it is only demonstrating the Soviet delay in the privatisation. Due to mistakes in reforms and social elements in the system, the transformation of the Soviet planned system into a free market economy has failed.The third economic change, was the Venture Law, that went into effect in June 1987 after Gorbachev and his leadership have decided to open the doors of the Soviet market to foreign firms. This was completely against the Marxist ideology and was viewed as an economic and political espionage by the Soviet party members, fearing that the capitalists would gain control over the Soviet market, exploiting their workers as well as stealing their ideas.29However, it was more the Soviet government and the newly bred maffia that took advantage of this, rather than the foreign companies which instead have brought advances to the Russian market.b) Agricultural reformsA similar situation was in the agrarian sector. In May 1, 1987 Gorbachev has authorised the establishment of individual farming and has introduced decollectivisation. However, again, this process was very slow. By 1990 there were only 20000 private farms in the Soviet Union, from that only 240 were registered in Russia and only 4 in Ukraine30Many who did set up the private farms were subject to attacks and were classified as kulaks. In contrast, to compare with contemporary dynamics, the Chinese process of decollectivisation went at a much faster pace. By 1980 in China all farms were decollectivised.31c) Anti-alcohol campaignPerestroika has also introduced socio-economic reforms to tackle serious problems like alcoholism that also affected the economical growth. Gorbachevs anti-alcohol campaign was aimed to decrease the uptake of alcohol, improve health and increase the efficiency of the work force and production. However, the anti-alcohol campaign had a rather negative impact on the Soviet economy. As this was a great hit for the state monopolies, including the disappearance of vineya rds in Georgia and other republics. It has decreased the tax income by 13% and was said to cost the Soviet Union 200 billion Rubles. It did not stop people from drinking, instead the policy encouraged black markets and increased the production of moonshine,32that were usually low-quality and harmful for health. Additionally, it had a side effect on the consumption of sugar as home-made vodka required large quantities of sugar for production. The increase in consumption was 10 kilograms per capita in only 5 years, effecting the market and the prices. Both sugar shortage and the reduction in imports of consumer goods combined with inflation caused a buyers panic.33Moreover, the situation got worse as not only sugar disappeared from the markets but normal goods from sugar to furniture. As a result consumer behavior was to buy as many goods as possible to avoid future shortages, spending hours in queues for nearly everything.34.d) Conclusion of socio-economic reformsDuring the years of Perestroika nothing significant was actually done to reform the economic methods. There were many laws adopted that allowed small businesses and private corporations, however, none had any fundamental effect on the principles of the Soviet economy. The political reforms have lead to governments losing of control over the national economy that they had planned out for many years. Gorbachevs indecisiveness in his reforms might explain the fact that he did not know what he was doing.A rapid decline in production has resulted in 20% decline in national income. The consumption of new machinery and lower tax revenues contributed to a rapid increase of the budget deficit. Table 1 shows the estimate budget deficit of the country between 1978 and 1990. CIA states that in 10 years the deficit had increased from 16 billion rubles to 68 billion rubles and later on increased even further reaching three digit values. Although different sources have different values and estimations, it is a fact t hat the situation catastrophically affected the people. As a result, to decrease the deficit more money was printed which has additionally increased the inflation. As Gorbachev has stated in his speech in the 1990 We have lost control over the financial situation in the country. By late 1990 the inflationary prices of goods were increasing at a 20% rate per annum and few years later this value has increased to 70%.35There were shortages of various consumer goods and a rationing system was introduced. This resulted in a drop of living standards, the Soviet Union fell to 82nd place in the world in terms of living standards. Another problem that has sumptuous during the economical crisis, was a serious debt as the expenditures were 20-30 % higher than the income (GDP)36. The debt of the Soviet Union was estimated to be about 60 billion dollars. The Soviet Union had to sell its metal(prenominal) reserves to purchase the foreign currency. This is a very bright illustration that Perestr oika has not only failed to improve the old system, instead it disturbed the old system and further deteriorated the situation.5. ConclusionAccording to the existing evidence, it is clear that Perestroika has suffered a defeat in the form it was originally conceived37from a socio-economic side and failed in achieving its main aims in improving the economic situation, instead had rather negative results and consequences. Gorbachevs reconstruction has weakend the social and economic conditions in the country. A further phrase by Aleksandr Zaychenko further proves this affirmation Russians today in 1989 eat worse than did Russians in 1913 under the Czars.38Even though elimination of the state monopoly in foreign trade was a positive sign in transformation to the market economy, as foreign corporations were able to show the Soviet system new and more advanced ways of doing business. This was a sign that He Gorbachev knew where he wanted to end up, with a more productive, consumer-orien ted economy, but he did not know how to get there.39Between 1985 and 1991, ten new economic reforms have been introduced, and not a single one was ever implemented40no one went down that road before. As a result this half-measure in the economy has lead to an economic crisis. After the reconstruction of the old approaches to the economy there were no new methods that would replace the old ways, the Soviet economy was stuck in the middle between the planned and private economies, which are considered as an economic failure. As stated by Marshall I. Goldman, an expert on the Soviet economy, his declare Went Wrong with Perestroika, clearly shows the fundamental problems in socio-economic sphere that were formed as result of Gorbachevs indecisive maneuvers and highlights their contribution to result in a total failure and the collapse of the whole system.On equilibrium, however, political factors seem to be more successful. Reforms like Glasnost and New Political Thinking, played a cru cial role in improving the U.S.-Soviet relations breaking the tensions and diminishing the possibility of a military conflict between the two military blocks, NATO and the Warsaw Pact, as well as finally opening the iron curtain and breaking the Berlin wall. Additionally, Mikhail Gorbachevs new thinkingduring Perestroika was the key in ending the Cold War. After 5 decades of hostilities, In the last few years, throughout the worldpeople were able to heave a sigh of relief, thanks to the changes forthe better in the substance and atmosphere of the relations betweencapital of the Russian Federation and Washington.41Additionally, after three decades of confrontation USSR became friends with China. This all was doubtlessly one of Gorbachevs successful achievements of his reforms.People take Gorbachev as a hero, others accuse him of causing a disaster42. Similarly Perestroika is considered as a failure because it has given way to the totalitarian control of the country and, on the other side, can be considered a success for heavy(a) freedom to people. Peoples conclusions are linked to their understanding of things.43These understandings will change with time and therefore change their whole idea towards the event.7. BibliographyBooksCharles Bukowski, and J. Richard Walsh, eds.,Glasnost, Perestroika, and the Socialist Community(New York Praeger Publishers, 1990)Peter J. Boettke,why Perestroika Failed The Politics and Economics of Socialist Transformation(New York Routledge, 1993)Mikhail S. Gorbachev, 39 Address at the Forty-Third Un General Assembly Session, December 7, 1988,The Soviet System From Crisis to Collapse, ed. Alexander Dallin andGail W. Lapidus (Boulder, CO Westview Press, 1995)Marshall I. Goldman,What Went Wrong with Perestroika(New York W. W. Norton, 1992)Ronald E. Powaski,The Cold War The United States and the Soviet Union, 1917-1991, (New York Oxford University Press, 1998)Dmitri N. Shalin, ed.,Russian Culture at the Crossroads Paradoxes of Postcomm unist Consciousness(Boulder, CO Westview Press, 1996)Joanne Wright, 3 The End of the Cold War The Brezhnev Doctrine,Why the Cold War Ended A Range of Interpretations, ed. Ralph Summy andMichael E. Salla (Westport, CT Greenwood Press, 1995)William E. Watson,The Collapse of Communism in the Soviet Union(Westport, CT Greenwood Press, 1998)doubting Thomas C. Owen,Russian Corporate Capitalism from Peter the Great to Perestroika(New York Oxford University Press, 1995)Hunt, Lynn The Making of the West Peoples and Cultures. (Bedford/St. Martins, Boston and London, 2009)MagazinePeter Hylarides, Mikhail Gorbachev and Perestroika,Contemporary ReviewAutumn 2008,Questia, Web, 1 Jan. 2011.JournalVanden Heuvel, Perestroika and After beau Ligachev Tells His Side,The Nation2 Dec. 1991,Questia, Web, 1 Jan. 2011.WebsitesStructural Reforms, 1986 to Mid-1988 http//www.country-data.com/cgi-bin/query/r-12788.htmlCommunist Party of the Soviet Union. CENTRAL COMMITTEE. MINUTES Of Meeting No. 2 of the Polit buro of the Central committee of the CPSU September 20, 1990, http//www.ibiblio.org/expo/soviet.exhibit/o2gorby.htmlMikhail Gorbachev, former USSR PresidentPerestroika won, but politically I lost. Euronews Inerview 05/11/09 1731 CET http//www.euronews.net/2009/11/05/mikhail-gorbachev-former-ussr-president-perestroika-won-but-politically-i-lost/1985 Anti- Alcohol Campaign http//www.soviethistory.org/index.php?page=subjectSubjectID=1985drylawYear=1985navi=byYear1987 thermonuclear Disarmament http//www.austria1989.org/index.php?option=com_contentview=articleid=66Itemid=961988 Gorbachev Ends the Cold War http//www.austria1989.org/index.php?option=com_contentview=articleid=67Itemid=97VideoGorbachev, Glasnost, Perestroika, Arms Agreement , http//www.youtube.com/watch?v=595W4JJHa2U